|
SARS
(Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome)
What is SARS?
SARS is a new strain of an acute flu that leads to a high fever,
a severe cough and an atypical pneumonia where the inflammation
of the lung tissue caused by this new type of virus leads to a severe
lung infiltration that can be detected with chest X-rays. Cases
similar to SARS have been known to the medical profession for several
decades under the name of "atypical viral pneumonia".
Most viruses
lead to a laryngotracheitis, affecting only the lining of the upper
airways like the trachea and the voice box. However, SARS is not
like this. It is a new strain of virus that goes right down into
the lung tissue and leads to more severe breathing problems from
secretions that plug the airsacs (alveoli) of the lungs. However,
only about 3% to 4% of patients who get SARS actually die as explained
in the links below (see CDC and WHO Internet sites). Here
is a brief review explaining the evidence in the medical literature
that is known at this time (April 2003). Since March 2003 it is
known that SARS likely is transmitted by a small virus belonging
into the same family of viruses like measles or mumps (the
Paramyxoviridiae family of viruses). This WHO link
explains this in more detail. However, Dr. Francis Allan Plummer
from the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg/Canada has isolated
a human metapneumo virus in six out
of 8 specimens from high suspicion cases for SARS
that were submitted to the Lab. It is at present not clear whether
there are only one or perhaps two or three similar viruses that
may work in concert in tricking the immune system not to mount an
immune response in some susceptible persons whereas in the majority
of patients the immune system produces enough antibodies to overcome
the disease.
This latest
publication
from the New England Journal of Medicine , which
was released one month early on Apr.10,2003, describes from the
SARS working group that there has been a corona virus isolated from
18 SARS patients who died from this disease 10 to 14 days into it
and that this is a new strain of virus, which likely originated
from a single ill health care worker from the Guangdong Province
in China. These researchers used genetic tests (reverse transcription-
polymerized chain reaction), electron microscopic tests of cell
cultures with throat swabs from infected SARS patients as well as
immunological tests with group specific corona virus antibodies
to pinpoint the cause of SARS.
The new name
for this virus: Urbani SARS-associated coronavirus in honor
of Dr. Carolo Urbani, a WHO investigator who died of SARS himself
when he investigated the early epidemic in Asia.
There might
be inborn (genetic) weaknesses in some patients. The National Institute
of Health is developing
a vaccine against the corona virus, which is thought
to trigger SARS. At the present time the best therapy is isolation
in a hospital for those who are very sick with a possible combination
treatment with corticosteroids and antiviral antibiotics, which
may be 70% effective in halting the disease. The most important
point is prevention of further transmission by isolation procedures
(quarantine). Hopefully there will be a vaccine available soon,
which could possibly be incorporated into the Flu vaccine.
Here is a link
to the official CDC site about SARS
This link brings
you to the World
Health Organization site (WHO) where SARS is discussed.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
Flu Shots
Prevent Heart Disease, Lung Disease, Strokes And Deaths
It has been
known for some time that flu shots would be beneficial. But it was
not known until now whether in larger field studies people who are
65 years or older would benefit significantly and to what degree
from yearly influenza vaccinations("flu shots"). The April
3rd, 2003 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine published
the answer to this question. Dr. Nichol from the University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, and his collegues have followed 140,055 patients of
whom 55.5% were vaccinated against the flu in the 1998/1999 flu
season. They also followed 146,328 subjects during the 1999-2000
flu season of whom 59.7% were vaccinated against the flu. Here is
a breakdown how they fared when compared to non-immunized controls.
| Patients
after Flu vaccinations. How did they do ? |
|
(based
on 1998/99 and 1999/2000 flu seasons)
|
|
| Complications: |
Observation:
|
Comments:
|
| Heart
disease: |
reduced
19% |
this
included heart failure and heart attacks |
| Hospitalization
for stroke: |
reduced
16% to 23% |
often
hospitalization for stroke patients can be weeks and months,
often resulting in other complications due to bacterial superinfections,
falls or clots |
| Pneumonia
and influenza rate: |
reduced
29% to 32% |
this
can lead to heart attacks and deaths from bacteria in the blood |
| Death
rates: |
reduced
48% to 50% |
all
of the deadly complications from getting the Flu remarkably
reduced by Flu shots! |
The examiners
of this study concluded that high risk patients (asthma patients,
patients with diabetes, cancer, elderly patients, arthritic patients
and patients with high blood pressure) should have a yearly Flu
vaccination. However, in my opinion anybody would benefit from regular
Flu vaccinations as this boosts the immune system in general protecting
against other infections and colds as well.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
Older
Americans Need More Knowledge About High Blood Pressure
A telephone
survey of 1,503 Americans age 50 or older was published recently
by Dr. Brent Egan from the Medical University of South Carolina,
Charleston, in the March 24, 2003 issue of the Archives of Internal
Medicine. Although 94% had their blood pressure measured at least
once in the past year, only 46% knew how much it was. Of all the
patients who knew that they had a systolic blood pressure of 140
mm mercury or higher, 30% did not know that this was abnormal and
was called "systolic hypertension (high blood pressure)".
20% of patients with established high blood pressure did not take
their medication or had on their own reduced the amount of medication
they should have taken. In this group only about 1 in 5 complained
that the cost of the medication would have been the reason for stopping
the blood pressure pills.
Here are some
more general results regarding this study in table form:
| Results
of a telephone survey regarding older Americans and their
understanding of high blood pressure |
| (modified
from March 24, 2003 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine)
|
|
| Findings:
|
Comments:
|
| Older
Americans have a higher rate of high blood pressure, particularly
high systolic blood pressure |
This
makes it even more important that they learn more about it and
that they learn to measure their blood pressure at home. |
| Older
Americans are not as educated about high blood pressure than
the younger generation |
Likely
related to upbringing and different interests; in the past healthcare
was left to physicians and nurses. Now we realize that only
we can look after ourselves, the physicians and nurses are "health
consultants" whom we hire to advise us. |
| Older
Americans prefer an integrated approach to the treatment of
high blood pressure utilizing traditional, complementary and
alternative treatments |
The
authors concluded that a combination of education and holistic
management strategies likely would work best. This needs to
include new research on identifying the most effective treatments.
I would like to add that weight loss (in case of increased BMI),
exercise and a zone-like diet would help complement traditional
drug regimens very effectively as well. Find more info at this
link
re. hypertension. |
Apart from the
remarks on the importance of education in the table above I would
like to stress how important it is for patients with high blood
pressure to learn how
to measure their own blood pressure at home.
The method of
how to do this is not as important as the fact that you buy and
use some kind of home blood pressure measuring device (either the
conventional bood pressure cuff or the more expensive electronic
device). You can measure and record your own blood pressure either
daily or 3 to 4 times per week and bring this record with you to
the doctor's office with your next check-up. With this method you
will gradually learn what life style factors bring your blood pressure
up and how much medicine you need to take to control the blood pressure
at all times. This will prevent major events such as heart attacks
and strokes and preserve eye-sight and kidney function.
Here are various
useful links regarding related topics.
Link regarding
body
mass index (BMI) .
Link regarding
high
blood pressure(hypertension)
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
Menopause
And "Perimenopause" In Women
In the February
19, 2003, issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association
there was an extensive review of the topic of menopause and the
time before and after menopause, called "perimenopause".
The authors,
Dr. Lori A. Bastian, from Duke University, and colleagues critically
reviewed 1,246 articles on this topic and identified 16 studies
that
were accepted as being reliable regarding the review of this topic.
They were interested
in finding menopause symptoms, signs and blood tests that would
be reliable in terms of assessing whether a woman would be approaching
menopause or would be in menopause. The result was that no single
test or symptom was reliable, but that a number of tests and symptoms
in combination were very helpful.
They measured
reliability by "likelihood ratios (LRs)". What this means
is that any value above 1.0 is significant, but the higher the number,
the more reliable and important is this fact or sign. I summarized
the findings in table form below:
| Results
of a Review Study on Menopause in Women |
| (modifed
according to Feb.19, 2003, issue of The Journal of the
American Medical Association) |
|
| Findings:
|
Likelihood
ratio (LR) |
Comments
(by Dr. Ray) : |
| self
assessment of going through the transition |
1.83 |
this
is based on the effects of the changing hormones on the woman
and how she feels it is affecting her |
| symptoms
of hot flashes |
3.10 |
lack
of estrogen from ovaries leads to a lability of the skin blood
vessels with increased skin perfusion as well as stimulation
of the sweat glands |
| night
sweats |
1.90
|
sleep
pattern is changed and there is a loss of the day / night rhythm
of skin perfusion |
| vaginal
dryness |
2.64 |
due
to lack of estrogen |
| high
follicle-stimulating hormone levels |
3.06 |
feedback
from estrogen missing, which stimulates the hypothalamus of
the brain to produce more FSH hormone |
| low
inhibin
B levels |
2.05 |
this
is a newer test, which is more specific than the FSH test and
also has some importance in fertility work-ups |
| Self-assessment
of perimenopausal status |
0.25 |
this
is not a reliable test as it is below 1.0. It was included to
show how good the other tests are in comparison |
The authors
concluded that there is no need for blood tests for menopause diagnosis
in a woman, if several points of the first 4 findings are positive
(top part of the table).
Here is a link
regarding menopause.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
Edible
Vaccines From Lettuce, Tomatoes And Other Plants
Can vaccines
be taken by mouth (orally)? Yes, we know this from the polio vaccine.
Can vaccines
be produced by plants? This does not sound likely, but this is exactly
what researchers have already achieved and what they are working
on now. A group of researchers under Dr. Robert Rose from the University
of Rochester in New York have been working on a number of vaccines
with the help of genetic engineering.
The rationale
is simple: in developing countries it can be difficult to keep vaccines
refrigerated and to administer them by injection in a sterile manner
through doctors and nurses. Also, the cost of production can be
a major factor with regard to effectiveness of the vaccine on a
population basis, if large parts of the community cannot afford
the vaccine. For many vaccines to be effective more than 85% of
the population have to be vaccinated. Newer research has shown that
the protein envelope of a virus, which has a certain surface antigen
associated with it, can be broken down into smaller subunits. According
to a review article in The Medical Post ( March 4, 2003, page 29)
Dr. Rose and his team have isolated the DNA sequence of the human
papillomavirus (HPV) envelope in the early 1990's. They were able
to program potatoes to grow the protein subparticles that were immunologically
active, but were not infective (no virus activity). In other words
after genetic engineering the plant grows a vaccine, which can be
safely consumed and the body mounts an immune response to this modified
virus protein similar to the polio vaccine, but without a trace
of virus.
As potatoes
have to be cooked before consumption, some of the effectiveness
of the vaccine gets lost. The researchers have since concentrated
on other plants like apples, bananas, tomatoes and lettuce, which
are eaten in the raw state. The various diseases that are being
tested at the present time are: hepatitis B, respiratory syncytial
virus (RSV), Norwalk virus, rotavirus and even the measles vaccine.
Dr. Charles
Arntzen from the Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona, has
successfully applied the above technology to the production of plant
vaccines against the Norwalk virus, the E.coli enterotoxin and hepatitis
B in potatoes and tomatoes. He is taking this a step further as
he is developing a technique of freeze-drying tomatoes containing
the vaccine against the Norwalk virus, which allows the vaccine
to be stored for long periods of time. When it is needed, it can
be rehydrated and could also be delivered in pill form to vaccinate
the population at risk at the time of an epidemic of enteritis the
with Norwalk virus.
In summary,
the new plant technology of vaccine production allows for much cheaper
vaccine manufacturing. It eliminates the problems surrounding sterile
injection techniques. The vaccine delivery by mouth allows for a
much simpler distribution to a population at risk and can be done
by lay persons. Also, a variety of vaccines will be able to be manufactured
this way in future. The plant production is similar to the photocopying
process where a template (the specific viral protein subparticle)
is being copied by the plant. This allows for a number of vaccines
against different strains of viruses to be programmed fairly quickly.
It is an exciting new technique.
Here is a link
to Influenza, which is one of the viral illnesses
that can be significantly suppressed by vaccination.
Here is a link
that explains the rationale
of vaccinations and vaccination schedules.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|