|
|
|
Health
Newsletter
new
every month
|
|
|
|
November
2005
HEALTH
TOPICS:
|
| Health
and Fitness |
| (health
information and |
| your
personal health) |
| Vol.4,
No.11, Nov. 7, 2005 |
|
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
|
|
|
|
Exotic
Mushrooms Best Source For Antioxidants
Antioxidants
provide powerful cellular protection, and several sources are
available through food. One of them under the name ergothioneine
was known to be available through food sources like wheat germ
or chicken liver. The latter is not necessarily a popular choice
for a lot of people! However, antioxidants are necessary to
protect us from diseases like arthritis, Alzheimers disease
and cancer.
Researchers at Penn State have better news in the meantime.
Joy Dubost, who led the research team, stated in a recent press
release, that exotic mushrooms like shiitake, oyster mushrooms,
king oyster or maitake mushrooms contain up to 13 mg of the
desirable antioxidant ergothioneine in a typical serving, about
40 times as much as wheat germ.
Consumers who are reluctant to try these varieties and are more
used to Portobello mushrooms, crimini mushrooms (brown mushrooms)
or even the ubiquitous white mushrooms, still get a good dose
of up to 5 mg ergothioneine per serving. Antioxidant levels
do not decrease when the mushrooms are cooked.
The Medical
Post, September 27, 2005, page 21
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
|
Pre-Conception
Nutrition For Healthy Children
The importance
for good maternal nutrition during pregnancy has been emphasized
for a long time. Of course in this case it was up to the mom-to-be
to avoid toxins, such as smoking and alcohol and to take prenatal
supplements along with sensible nutrition. Enticing the women
away from the excesses of the standard Western diet would yield
handsome health benefits for the country. Dr. David Barker,
a medical advisor to the British government pointed out, that
this approach would reduce heart disease, diabetes and other
chronic diseases in the mothers as well as in their offspring.
This concept does not address all the aspects, which are important
for a healthy pregnancy and a healthy baby.
For the past 20 years a group of around 20 British family physicians,
obstetricians and researchers under the name of Foresight has
been putting a program into practice, which identifies and addresses
the health deficiencies in prospective parents. Almost all couples
that followed the pre-conception program had previously experienced
problems relating to conception, pregnancy and birth. In one
follow-up study of 367 couples that followed the Foresight program
from 1990 to 1992, 327(89%) of the women became pregnant and
had healthy, well-developed babies. None of the babies suffered
malformations and none was transferred to special care. Of the
367 couples, 217(59 %) had suffered from infertility (from 1
to 10 years) and 139 (38%) had histories from 1 to 5 previous
miscarriages. Eleven (3%) had previously given birth to a stillborn
child, 40 had small-for-date babies and 15 had already had a
low birth weight baby (less than 2,500 g). Seven couples had
a previous baby with malformations and three had lost a baby
to sudden infant death.
In a larger follow-up study of 1,076 couples, almost all of
whom had previous fertility or miscarriage problems, 846 conceived
success rate of 78%, as reported by Belinda Barnes, who runs
Foresight. There were four problem pregnancies, including one
Down syndrome baby, two terminations and one child with an adhesion
of the intestine, which was correctable. This is a complication
rate of only 0.47 %. As the complication rate in the general
population amounts to 6.43%, the pre-conception program has
only 1/7th of the complications, a strong indicator that a pre-conception
program does make a difference.
The Medical
Post, September 27, 2005, page 33
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
|
Digital
Mammography Superior For Some
Mammography
has been considered a reliable screening test for breast lumps.
It has become a crucial diagnostic tool for the early recognition
of breast cancer. Nevertheless there are situations when the
test has its limitations, which is especially true for women
who have very dense breast tissue.
Dr. Martin Yaffe, PhD, a biophysics professor at the University
of Toronto and Women's College Health Sciences Center has done
the groundwork for digital mammography, and 20 years of research
and development have finally paid off. For women who have dense
breast tissue, digital mammography will be the superior diagnostic
tool, as opposed to the conventional film mammography. In a
study that involved 42,760 patients who were asymptomatic both
film mammography and digital mammography were used for screening.
In the general study population the accuracy of the two methods
was found to be similar. In the group of women under 50 years
of age the digital method showed significantly more accuracy
(84% vs. 69%). Accuracy for women with dense breasts
was also higher with the digital method (78% vs. 68%). It
also was superior for premenopausal women (82%vs.67%).
The digital
equipment used was still in its development stages, and the
potential of the technology will become even greater with more
sophisticated equipment down the road. At this point it is not
cost effective to use the digital method for all women. The
digital system costs between one and a half to four times as
much as the film systems. "There is certainly no indication
that digital is any less accurate than film mammography, but
certainly the benefit is in a defined subgroup of women at this
time," states Dr.Yaffe. For most women film mammography
remains a method that works well.
The Medical
Post, October 4, 2005, page1, 62.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
|
Hard
Liquor And Beer Hike Colon Cancer Risk
The old
adage of "everything in moderation" has become something
like an excuse-me note for those who do not wish to change their
lifestyle. And the little bit that supposedly does not harm
is another variation in the theme of excuses. Yet the truth
remains, that this does not apply to various lifestyle habits.
It still matters, what you ingest in your food or drink, as
Dr. Joseph Anderson found out in a study of 2,291 patients.
All of these
individuals presented for screening colonoscopy. It turned out
that those who had a history of consuming more than 8 drinks
of spirits or beer per week for at least ten years were more
than twice as likely as abstainers to have significant cancer
of the colon. The group that drank beer and hard liquor (and
hard liquor also applies to the category of mixed drinks) faced
at least a one in five chance to have significant colorectal
neoplasia (meaning cancer of the colon or rectum). This came
as no surprise to the researchers, as beer and hard liquor seem
equally pernicious.
Even though wine does not seem to carry the same risk, Dr. Anderson
is in no position to condone counseling patients to drink wine
instead. His advice to other doctors is to " counsel the
patients on what they are drinking and counsel them to temper
their drinking."
The
Medical Post, October 11, 2005, page 46
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
|
More
Is Not Always Better In Exercise
Physical
activity and good nutrition are the keys for a healthy immune
system. Dr. David Nieman, PhD, from the Appalachian State University
of Boone, N.C. has found that exercise and nutrition play a
strong role in boosting immunity. His past research showed that
women who walked briskly for 30 to 45 minutes five days for
12 to 15 weeks had colds half as often as inactive women. This
is true even for the aging population, where immunity tends
to decline; some research has shown that fit elderly people
have better-preserved immune systems.
It is tempting to conclude, that more exercise would lead to
even better benefits, but the research results are quite different.
Exercising for too long (beyond 90 minutes) appears to cause
a steep drop in immune function that can last up to 24 hours.
In the 1987 Los Angeles Marathon, Dr. Nieman surveyed 2,311
runners and found those who raced were six times more likely
to get sick afterward compared with those who dropped out of
the race for non-medical reasons. Runners who trained more than
96 km per week during the two months before a race doubled their
chances for sickness compared with those who trained less than
36 km per week.
In lab tests on marathon runners who ran on a treadmill for
90 minutes to 3 hours at 80% aerobic capacity, the level of
immune cells had decreased (neutrophils, monocytes, natural
killer cells, T cells and B cells). All these players in the
immune system leave the blood and concentrate on the effort
to do repairs and maintenance on the muscles. As a result the
front line soldiers are unavailable for defense when viruses
are present.
The best strategies for active as well as not-so-active individuals
remain similar.
-Minimize life stresses-mental and emotional.
-Avoid over training and chronic fatigue.
-Curb exercise if you have a fever or systemic infection.
-Eat a well-balanced diet with adequate energy.
The Medical
Post, October 11, 2005, page 19
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|
|
|
|