|
Heart
Scan Saves Lives In Diabetics
A simple new
nuclear
perfusion study of the heart when
applied to healthy appearing diabetics (adult onset or "type
2 diabetics") showed silent hardening of the coronary arteries
in 21.6%. This large study of an American medical team was recently
presented at the 18th Congress of the International Diabetes Federation
in Paris/France. Dr. F. Wackers, professor of medicine from Yale
University school of medicine and one of the lead investigators,
explained that 1,124 patients with diabetes in the age range of
55 to 75 years who were all thought to not have any heart blood
vessel disease, either had nuclear perfusion studies performed and
a control group did not.
As indicated
above to the surprise of the investigators 113 patients of 522 (=21.6%)
had positive heart scans showing perfusion difficulties of the heart
muscle. Further testing with other methods revealed that 73% indeed
had perfusion defects and 27% had other heart disease, electrocardiogram
abnormalities and other heart dysfunctions. Conventional assessment
tools such as a smoking history, determination of degree of obesity,
blood pressure,kidney disease , high blood lipid levels, high C-reactive
protein levels, the diabetes test hemoglobin A1C or homocysteine
levels in the blood were also assessed. However, these conventional
tests did not help in predicting that these patients would have
developed perfusion defects in their heart muscle. This was due
to hidden narrowing of the heart blood vessels (=coronary arteries)
and this affected the supply of nutrients and oxygen to the heart
even though these patients were completely symptom free at the beginning
of the trial.
Dr. Vivian Fonsega,
a professor of medicine and pharmacology at Tulane University in
New Orleans and co-researcher of the team, added that after a follow-up
of 1 year those who had normal initial nuclear perfusion studies
of the heart only 1% developed serious heart disease. These control
patients who have now been followed for 3 years overall remained
very healthy. In other words a normal (called "negative")
nuclear perfusion test in diabetics predicts a better longterm outcome
than a positive perfusion test.
With this heart
scan the cardiologist can identfy the high risk group among diabetics
and can subsequently concetrate on doing something actively about
the identified diseased heart blood vessel(="coronary artery")
disease. Identified narrowing in the coronary arteries ("stenotic
arterial lesions") can be overcome by prying them open and
placing heart stents across the affected section utilizing catheters
(angiography). In other cases heart bypass surgery can be done by
the heart surgeon to improve the perfusion of the heart muscle.
The researchers stressed that those diabetics at risk can be identified
with this test and the life expectancy of this high risk group of
patients can be significantly prolonged. The study will continue
for several more years so that the longterm results of any intervention
can be measured when compared to controls.
Based on
The Medical Post (Sept. 23, 2003 ): p. 55.
Here is a link
to a chapter
on diabetes and here is a link
to heart attacks.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
Flu Shot
Cuts Death Rate Into Half
An earlier publication
in the New
England Journal of Medicine in March 2003 has shown
that the death rate of people 65 years or older who were vaccinated
against the flu, dropped into half when they were exposed to the
flu and were compared to non-vaccinated controls. On Oct. 9, 2003
Dr. Megan Wren, associate director of the internal medicine residency
at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine,
reminded physicians that with the upcoming flu season it is important
to include everybody who is healthy at age
50 or older
(as the CDC has suggested now for 3 years) with influenza
vaccination . Many physicians are still not aware that the rules
have been changed to incude younger persons.
Here are recommendations
of who should get a vaccination in table form.
| Who
should get the flu vaccine |
| Group
of people: |
Comments: |
| all
people age 50 or over |
the
immune system weakens with age, that's why complications of
the flu are more common in this age group |
| women
who will be in the 2nd or 3rd trimester of a pregnancy during
November through to March |
protects
the fetus from the flu virus in the most vulnerable period of
the development of the fetus |
| chronic
heart disease or lung disease (including asthma) |
the
flu affects the lungs and the heart most readily |
| chronic
kidney or liver disease |
these
chronic diseases weaken the immune system |
| people
without a spleen and cancer patients |
the
immune system is weak in these patients |
| children
and adults with any chronic disease including diabetes |
chronic
illnesses weaken the immune system in young and old |
| people
on imunosuppressive medications |
the immune system is weak in these patients |
| all
close family members of any of the above people |
the
CDC hopes that this stops the spread of the flu into this vulnerable
group of patients |
Dr. Wren pointed
out that the risk from a flu vaccination is minimal. Contrary to
public belief the flu vaccine does not cause fever, unwellness or
muscle aches. The only effect is a mildly sore arm at the site of
injection.
This year the
FDA
has approved a live flu vaccine that is administered
as a nasal spray. This is a live modified flu virus that has been
"trained" to only multiply in the colder nasal cavity,
but not in the warmer airways. Like with all live viral vaccines
pregnant women are not allowed to take this. Dr. Wren also mentioned
that people with chronic illnesses, with immune deficiencies (e.g.
AIDS and cancer patients) and healthy patients over the age of 50
cannot take this live vaccine. All others from age 5 to 49 can take
it, but presently this is still very costly (one nasal mist application
in 2003 is about 50.00$ US).
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
Better
Recovery From Strokes Through Early CAT Scans
In the September
2001 issue of the American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Am J Neuroradiol
- 01-SEP-2001; 22(8): 1534-42) a
group of clinicians from the Foothills Hospital in Calgary/Alberta
had published an article with a scoring system for CAT scans (also
abbreviated CT scans) that would be done on every patient with a
stroke. By utilizing early CT scans and this scoring system an ischemic
stroke (due to a blood vessel that closed off in the brain) could
be rapidly assessed. Within 3 hours of the beginning of the stroke
the treating physician would know whether the patient would benefit
from clot-busting drugs (tPA or tissue plasminogen activator) or
not. Dr. Pexman and co-workers had noted that patients with an Alberta
Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS)
of less than 7 had a poor survival rate or an outcome with high
dependency on caregivers. Patients with a score of 7 to 10 had a
much better survival chance and were ideal candidates for the clot-busting
therapy. The brain of the stroke patient depicted by CT scans using
this method is divided into 10 regions and the findings are systematically
evaluated by the radiologist and an ASPECTS score is obtained.
Dr. Michael
Hill, an assistant professor at the University of Calgary, and one
of the co-workers of this initial study has now completed a further
follow-up study together with Dr. A.Buchan, director of the Calgary
Stroke Program. The results were published in the August 2003 issue
of the medical journal "Stroke". They found that ischemic
strokes (from clots in the middle
cerebral artery) have the best outcome when detected
by CT scan early (within 3 hours of the beginning of the stroke)
and if thrombolysis therapy with tPA, the clot-busting drug, is
done before 6 hours after the beginning of the stroke. The lack
of blood circulation from a stroke,which closed the middle
cerebral artery, is shown in this link.
What does that
mean in practical terms? Let us assume a patient is suddenly losing
all of the strength and movement in one arm and losing speech as
well. An emergency CT scan is done right away and it is determined
that the patient has had a stroke in the middle cerebral artery.
Let us say that the ASPECTS score was between 7 and 10. This patient's
physicians would likely treat the stroke with the clot-busting medicine
mentioned being confident that there likely will be a good outcome.
In the past,
before this therapy was available, many of these patients would
end up with a permanent arm palsy without much function and sustain
a permanent speech deficit as well. After the clot-busting therapy
many of these patients who have a good outlook will now have a considerable,
if not full return of function in their arm and regain their speech
as well. Unfortunately, the opposite is true as well: those with
a poor ASPECTS score below 7 will not be candidates for the clot-busting
therapy and will tend to do poorly.
This scoring
system of early CT scans with strokes (ASPECTS) is already being
used in several countries such as Canada, the US, Australia and
Europe. "Early detection and intervention in stroke is critical
to achieve a positive outcome" said Dr. A.Buchan, director
of the Calgary Stroke Program, who is also a professor in the department
of clinical neurosciences of the University of Calgary/Alberta.
Here is a link
for more background
on strokes.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
Schizophrenia
Gene Discovered
In the not too
distant future new tests and new antipsychotic drugs ("designer
drugs" rather than "trial and error drugs") for schizophrenia
will likely be developed in the US because of the following new
findings.
At the 19th
International Congress of Genetics in Melbourne/Australia the Nobel
Prize laureate Dr. Susumu Tonegawa, who had won the 1987 Nobel Prize
for Medicine, reported about his new discovery of a gene that controls
schizophrenia. This has already been studied
extensively in mice by the research team that he
is heading (from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute of Technology
(MIT) in Cambridge/Mass).
Together with
other collegues from other Centers (Duke University, Rockefeller
University and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons)
they have developed an animal model, a "schizophrenic mouse",
that is defective for the schizophrenia gene. Researchers had found
that an enzyme called "calcineurin" was missing in schizophrenic
families where genetic defects could be located in one particular
gene. Subsequently this type of gene was also shown to be important
for the normal brain metabolism in mice. The detection of a mouse
model for schizophrenia has made it much easier to do ground-breaking
research in the field of schizophrenia. Dr. Tonegawa said that the
existing drugs for schizophrenia were developed by trial and error.
In some patients these drugs do not work, in many others they have
serious side-effects. He stated further that in future there will
be a new class of anti-psychotic drugs with minimal side-effects
as they will specifically normalize the calcineurin production.
This in turn will normalize the derailed brain metabolism. In schizophrenics
it is in this area where the psychotic behavior originates due to
a lack of normal calcineurin production. This enzyme is found not
only in brain tissue, but also in immune cells such as the T lymphocytes
throughout the body. Because of this connection a future modern
treatment for schizophrenia will likely normalize the brain metabolism,
but also have beneficial effects on the entire immune system.
Here is a link
to a review
of schizophrenic disorders.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
Ozone
And Pollution Linked To Asthma
Ozone and pollutants
were the topics of two independent publications in October 2003,
one in the New England Journal of Medicine (N Engl J Med) and the
other in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
Dr. Janneane
F. Gent of Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut,
and her team studied the effects of ozone and small pollutant particles
on 271 cases of asthma in children less than 12 years of age (results
published in the Oct. 8 ,2003 issue of JAMA). The researchers asked
the question whether the air standards of the Environmental Protection
Agency would be safe for asthmatic children. From spring 2001until
now (about 2 years) exposure of air pollution was measured.
They found that
in terms of particulate matter in the air the minimum standards
were acceptable and no worsening of asthma took place because of
flucutations in this component of air pollution (fine particulate
matter of 2.5 micrometers or less). However, exposure to fluctuating
ozone levels considered sofar to be safe were found to have profound
effects in terms of worsening the asthma in the group of children
being followed. For every 50 parts per billion (ppb) increase (in
one hour ozone level) the wheezing of these astmatic children increased
by 35% and chest tightness increased by 47%. At the time of the
highest ozone exposure from a bad day of pollution, which was still
"acceptable" to the standards of the Environmental Protection
Agency, there was a 32% increase in shortness of breath and the
children had to increase their medications by an average of 8% to
cope with their asthma attacks (based on JAMA
2003;290:1859-1867,1915-1916).
A different
facet of the asthma problem was dealt with in the Oct. 9, 2003 issue
of the New England Journal of Medicine. Dr. Malcolm R. Sears from
the McMaster University in Hamilton/Canada reported about a group
of 613 children born in Dunedin/New Zealand in 1972 and 1973 who
were followed with breathing tests and questionnaires until they
reached the age of 26 years. This study showed that it does matter
very much what lung irritants the very young asthmatic was exposed
to and what lung irritants continue to affect the person later in
life.
About half of
the study population had at least one wheezing attack during the
26 years of observation. Contrary to popular belief asthma is not
something "you grow out of" with age as 26.9% either had
wheezing that persisited all the time (14.5%) or where the wheezing
came back in adult life(12.4%). Allergies to house dust were associated
with a risk of more than double and general airway hypersensitivity
was associated with a triple risk of causing wheezing persistence
or causing a return to wheezing. Other factors that were contributing
to risk were female gender (1.7-fold risk) and exposure to cigarette
smoke (1.8-fold risk). Those who started smoking young had the highest
risk of asthma persistence and severity.
The more wheezing
attacks there were and the more persistent the asthma was, the more
permanently abnormal the lung function tests remained. The authors
concluded that intervention against factors that lead to asthma
must be initiated at a very young age. It is crucial to not allow
environmental factors (ozone, pollution, allergens, cigarette smoke
etc.) to interact with the asthma gene as this will lead to the
more severe and chronic forms of asthma with permently abnormal
lung function.
These two studies
would reconfirm what the recent Swedish
family lifestyle study had
found as well. All of these studies point to the importance of
the air quality and how the environment affects not only those with
asthma, but affects everybody. Asthmatics simply are the tip of
the iceberg due to a genetic weakness with which they were born.
This makes asthmatics particularly vulnerable to pollution and to
other environmental factors.
Link to a chapter
on asthma from Dr. Schilling's Net Health Book.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|