|
China
Blows Alarm Whistle On
Smoking
The risks of
smoking are being addressed in China, where roughly 300 million
people or one quarter of the population are puffing away. The number
is rising by about 3 million new smokers each year, and according
to statistics of the WHO 700,000 die each year from smoking.
In November
of 2003 China joined the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
(FCTC), a subsidiary of the World Health Organization. As a member
China is now obliged to tighten restrictions on cigarette marketing
and consumption.
Due to an economic boom in the country foreign tobacco giants are
putting their hope into this rising market, as revenue has decreased
elsewhere in the world. So far tobacco taxes, which are collected
from the 1.7 trillion cigarettes sold in China amount to 8 billion
$US or one tenth of government revenue. In the wake of SARS, however,
the realization has come to the forefront, that health care cost
have a severe impact on the economy of a country. Despite the seemingly
enticing short-term gain from tobacco tax revenue, short cuts in
health care can economically damage a country in the long run.
Health officials
will have a battle with their counterparts in finance, when it comes
to implementing tobacco control. In some areas of the country the
sale of tobacco products to children has been banned and an attempt
has been made to restrict cigarette commercials. Powerful tobacco
lobby groups actively undermine these efforts.
It is encouraging to see at least a beginning of public education
about the risks of smoking. However, in a nation where cigarette
manufacturing and consumption are the highest worldwide, it will
be a long and arduous journey to clear the air to better health.
Based on
The Lancet 363, No. 9402 (Jan. 3, 2004)
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
Old-Fashioned
Fish Oil Boosts Heart Health
You do not need
to spoil your appetite with the thought of swallowing cod liver
oil, but see yourself enjoy a piece of salmon instead. Dr.
Jehangir N Din and collegues published an article entitled "Omega
3 fatty acids and cardiovascular diseasefishing for a natural
treatment" in the first January edition of the British Medical
Journal (BMJ 2004;328:30-35,January 3, 2004). These cardiology researchers
from the University of Edinburgh/England have reviewed all of the
recent medical literature regarding the beneficial effects of omega-3-fatty
acids on heart disease. The following are some facts they found.
| Facts
regarding omega-3-fatty acids: |
| Omega-3-fatty
acids from fish and fish oils protect against heart disease
|
| Following
heart attacks fish oil is helpful in preventing more heart attacks |
| Hardening
of arteries stops when fish oil or fish is eaten regularly |
|
Rapid
response critics pointed out that exercise
is as important as fish oil
|
| Trials
with fish oil showed reduction in death rates from strokes and
heart attacks from between 15% and 29% over 2 to 3.5 years (several
studies) |
| The
beneficial effects are due to a combination of: stabilizing
irregular heart beats, preventing clots, countering hardening
of arteries, countering inflammation, improving function of
lining of arteries, lowering of triglycerides (bad fatty acids)
and lowering of blood pressure |
The interesting
story regarding the omega-3-fatty acids, which have anti-inflammatory
qualities, is that they balance the detrimental effects of the omega-6-fatty
acids, which lead to inflammation not only in joints, but also in
blood vessels. In the standard North American and European foods
the omega-6-fatty acids are overconsumed. To counter the bad effects
of the omega-6-fatty acids, more omega-3-fatty acids need to be
ingested.
So, what should
we consume in terms of omega-3-fatty acids? The American Heart Association
made these recommendations:
| Fish
or fish oil capsules as a protective effect on blood vessels*
: |
| Patients
without documented coronary heart disease: Eat a variety of
(preferably oily) fish at least twice weekly. Include oils and
foods rich in linolenic acid |
| Patients
with documented coronary heart disease: Consume 1 g of eicosapentanoic
and docosahexanoic acid daily, preferably from oily fish. Supplements
could be considered in consultation with a doctor |
|
Patients
with hypertriglyceridemia: Take 2-4 g of eicosapentanoic acid
and docosahexanoic acid daily, provided as capsules under
a doctor's care
|
Current consumption
of omega-3-fatty acids in North America and Europe is low. Recently
an expert US panel of nutritionists determined that the US consumption
per day is about 0.1 to 0.2 grams per day and should be 0.65 grams
per day as a minimum according to the recommendations by the American
Heart Association.
The authors
of this paper from England disagree and state that at least 1 gram
per day would be needed to lower the heart attack risk to the low
levels in Asia. The British Nutrition Foundation has recommended
to use 1.2 grams of omega-3-fatty acids per day.
How does that
translate into how much fish you would have to eat to get about
1 gram of omega-3-fatty acids per day? To make things simpler I
have categorized fish and seafood in the table below based on the
data from this article into low, medium and high marine derived
omega-3-acid foods. You obviously need to eat more of the low category
seafood to achieve 1 gram of omega-3-fatty acid than of the high
category seafood.
| How
much fish and seafood you need to eat to get 1 gram of omega-3-fatty
acids... |
| Concentration
of omega-3-fatty acids in seafood: |
Type
of fish and seafood consumed: |
| Low
(eat 1 lbs) |
Catfish,
Haddock |
| Medium
(eat 1/3 -1/2 lbs) |
Tuna,
Halibut, Oyster, Cod, Flounder, Sole |
|
High (eat
2 or 3oz.) |
Atlantic salmon, Sardines, Rainbow trout, Atlantic herring,
Mackerel |
Before you overindulge
in seafood from the low and medium category, check with your doctor
first whether you are allowed so much protein. Some people have
protein restrictions due to poor kidney function or because of gout.
The authors of this study stated that you should eat a seafood meal
with 1 gram of omega-3-fatty acid twice per week. Other sources
of omega-3-fatty acids (=alpha-linolenic acid) are plant products
such as soy beans,flaxseed, walnuts and rapeseed oil. In Asia fish
and soy bean products are consumed in much bigger quantities than
in the US. This would be a good complementation.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
Poverty
Still A Threat To Mothers' Lives
Adrienne Germain
from the International Women's Health Coalition, New York, wrote
a review in the Lancet (Lancet 363: 65-66,
2004) about the state
of health and mortality of pregnant women (maternal death rate)
around the world. 500,000 pregnant girls and women die around the
globe every year from conditions that are preventable or treatable.
99% of these live in developing countries. At the same time 3.9
million newborns die every year in their first 4 weeks of life!
2004 is the
10-year anniversary of the recommendation for reproductive health
from the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development
(ICPD). The maternal death rate in Europe is about 1 in 4000 pregnancies;
in many African countries (sub-Saharan Africa) it is 1 in 16! Despite
some progress that has occurred, still 70% of all deaths associated
with pregnancy occur in only 13 countries. In another article in
the Lancet (Lancet 2004; 363: 23-27)
Prof. Wendy Graham and co-workers used a new familial technique
to determine whether there is a statistical association between
poverty and the maternal death rate. The answer is not only a clear
"yes" for the maternal death rate within one country,
but there is a clear association between poverty and maternal death
rate in countries all around the world!
A high mortality rate in babies and children in addition to the
maternal death rate has traditionally been a grave concern in poor
countries. Research in development countries has shown that 70%
of the poorest 1.3 billion people in the world are women. The study
also shows that these mothers have a high mortality rate. Maternal
death can occur during pregnancy or birth, and the poorer the population
group, the higher the maternal death rates will be. The reasons
are varied: for the poorest of the poor, medical treatment is often
unaffordable.
Also seemingly
simple measures such as clean drinking water, toilets and whether
floors are present in dwellings do have an impact on health. At
the same time the level of education determines whether death rates
are higher or lower. These results are not only true for one specific
country. Even though most of the alarming numbers come from the
African countries such as Burkina Faso, Chad, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali,
and Tanzania, other countries like Indonesia and the Philippines
show the same troubling picture.
The main causes of maternal deaths were due to the following conditions:
bleeding after delivery, early pregnancy bleeding; infections that
would lead to sepsis and death; complications surrounding abortions;
blood pressure problems such as eclampsia with seizures and kidney
damage; and prolonged labor when the baby's head is too large. This
latter condition requires an Cesarean section on an emergency basis,
which is not always readily available in rural areas.
As we know from
other studies, even closer to home, poverty and rural isolation
remain a risk to health and life.
Adrienne Germain in her editorial review pointed out that some poor
countries such as Bangladesh have taken the recommendations for
reproductive health from the 1994 ICPD-conference seriously and
have instituted a nationally sponsored program.
The result
has been that between 1988 and 2002 the percentage of women receiving
antenatal care has improved from 26% to 47% while the maternal death
rates have declined from 410 to 320 per 100,000 women during and
after the pregnancy. Childhood mortality also improved significantly
as did the mothers life expectancy (from 58 to 60 years). There
are success stories in other countries as well.
What is needed is political will around the globe, co-operation
between the appropriate agencies such as the WHO, the UNICEF, the
International Women's Health Coalition, and others. Locally in every
country it is vital to have an interdisciplinary co-operation to
fight poverty and to provide shelter with a certain minimum living
standard.
Link to UNICEF.
Link to WHO.
Link to
International Women's
Health Coalition.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
Flu Season
Not Over Yet
Influenza type
A is the cause of many flu epidemics including the one that recently
affected the northern hemisphere. It is known to change its surface
characteristics from time to time. This has occurred in the southern
hemisphere (Australia and New Zealand) during the summer of 2003
and the same new type has caused the recent epidemic in Canada,
the US and Europe.
Prior strains
of flu viruses in recent years were variants of the Panama strain,
that's why the infection specialists decided in the beginning of
2003 to suggest a Panama strain type vaccine to be used for protection
for this flu winter season. However, 70% of the cases tested in
Canada by the end of November turned out to be influenza type A/Fujian,full
name A/Fujian/411/2002(H3N2), different from type A/Panama, full
name A/Panama/2007/99(H3N2), according to Dr. Theresa Tam. She is
a specialist in the division of respiratory diseases at the Health
Canada Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control. Similar
observations regarding a shift from the type a/Panama to the type
A/Fujian strain of the flu virus has also been reported in the US
and in Europe. It appears that those who have been vaccinated with
the type A/Panama vaccine have had partial protection from this
new flu as some of the flu virus characterisitics (e.g. the H3N2
determinants) are the same.
Dr. Tam mentioned
that the recent deaths in children from the flu in the US, England
and Canada would likely be explained by the fact that in the last
3 years there have not been any H3 type flus and the flus that did
circulate were relatively mild. This means that children have not
developed enough background resistance to fight a flu when it comes.
Most adults have background resistance, but older people are loosing
some of the resistance due to aging. Dr. Tam explained that not
too many children have had the flu vaccination. One would expect
that children are most vulnerable for the flu and this explains
why these deaths would have occurred.
Production
of flu vaccines that protect from flus: One of the problems
with getting the best match for an upcoming flu season is the lag
period between the decision to produce a certain type of flu vaccine
and the mass production of the vaccine to serve a world population.
This can take 6 to 8 months. A new technique of vaccine production
is being investigated, called "reverse genetics", where
the lag period may only be a few weeks.
Dr. Webster,
an infectious disease specialist at the St. Jude Children's Research
Hospital in Memphis, has produced a vaccine with this method against
an avian flu with the characteristics H5N1(different from the others
mentioned above). This is an older flu transmitted by birds that
has resurfaced earlier in 2003 again. However, this vaccine that
has been produced in cell culture and not in egg cultures, has only
been tested in animal models, not in humans yet. Both Dr. Webster
and Dr. Tam agree that human trials under FDA guidelines are needed
to test these newer vaccines utilizing reverse genetics. Regulatory
and patent issues need to be settled for this to happen.
Use of antiviral
drugs: Another issue is that type A influenza can be treated
with antiviral antibiotics, but every flu season these types of
drugs tend to run short. Each country should have a national stockpile
of these antiviral drugs (such as Tamiflu) so that enough stock
is available in case of a serious epidemic where the vaccine may
not fit the flu strain that comes around. This is not happening
at the present.
What is needed
is that international discussions take place through the Global
Health Security Network (right now consisting of the G7 countries
and Mexico), Dr.Tam said.
Conclusion:
The flu season has started early this season. Many people have
died because of a lack of vaccination. Some of those who were vaccinated
against the flu may have caught the flu as the fit this year with
regard to the vaccine was not the best. However, they likely survived
the flu, whereas those who did not have the vaccine were more likely
to have experienced the flu more severely and some of these have
died. It is not too late to get the flu vaccine before the spring
season. Typically there is another peak of the flu between February
and April.
Based
in part on The Medical Post, Dec.9, 2003 (p.1 and 73).
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
Any Diet
A Winner Research Says
Dr. Michael
Dansinger reported at a recent annual meeting of the American Heart
Association about a study where he compared the effect of 4 major
diet plans on the lowering of risk factors for heart disease.
Dr. Dansinger
is the director of obesity research at the Tufts New England Medical
Centre's Atherosclerosis Research Lab in Boston. Originally, the
objective was to see whether any of the following four diets investigated
would be superior: the Atkins diet, the Ornish diet, the Zone diet
and the Weight Watchers diet. In the table below there are links
for each of these diet plans. Briefly, the Atkins diet is a high
protein/low carbohydrate diet; the Ornish diet is a vegetarian/low-fat
diet; the zone diet is a low-glycemic load/balanced protein/low
fat diet; weight watchers is a calorie restricted diet.
160 obese patients
were divided into 4 groups and assigend to one of these four diet
plans.
They were instructed
in the type of diet plan they were to follow in 4 couselling sessions
in the beginning of the weight loss program. The participants ranged
in age from 22 to 72 years of age (average age 50) and had on average
starting weight of 220 lbs. They were to follow the diet plan for
2 months strictly and were allowed to follow less supervised for
another 10 months. To the surprise of the research team under Dr.
Dansinger they all lost about the same amount of weight (average
of weight loss 10 lbs or 5% of body weight), in other words they
were all successful with any of these programs and none was superior.
Here are the results in modified tabular form:
| Comparison
of various diets with regard to weight loss effectiveness |
| Diets
that were compared: |
Reduction
of heart risk (Framingham score): |
Dropout
rates over 1 year: |
| Atkins
diet |
12.3% |
48% |
| Ornish
diet |
6.6% |
50% |
|
Zone
diet |
10.5% |
35% |
| Weight
Watchers diet |
14.7% |
35% |
Dr. Dansinger
indicated that the focus would now have to shift from "which
is the best diet plan" to "which is the best diet plan
for a particular patient". The doctor should attempt to fit
the weight loss programs that fit patients' food preferences best
and that patients can easiest fit into their lifestyle. This will
hopefully lead to the lowest dropout rate. This trial showed that
the Zone diet and the Weight Watchers diet had the least dropout
rates. But those who stayed on the Atkins or Ornish diet were successful
with their weight loss program also, as these may have been fitting
these patients best. In other words, if the one diet plan does not
work satisfactorily, try another one. The common denominator with
all food plans was some form of calorie restriction despite all
of the differences.
Based
on The Medical Post, Dec. 16, 2003 (p. 15).
Here is a link
to the Net Health Book's weight
loss and diet chapter.
| §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ |
|